To sign up is to commit yourself to making an effort to sort through any number of the weekly 297 articles and change them to third-person. This goal requires a coalition of willing editors thus, before a project is established we must know that there is a sufficient amount of users who will help out, therefore making the project realistic. We can create a project to encompass all this or add it to the manual of style project, which covers third-person.Īny comments and suggestions are welcome if this (type of) idea doesn’t work, what can we do about this issue? 69.l25 ( talk) 04:27, Febru(UTC) Even if a page does not have first-person, it may use "the player" or similar incorrect words that this effort can eliminate.As more pages are added, we can just continue the weekly list, even if our time surpassed a year, as the proposed system only accounts 16,620 articles.If everyone with special rights participated, we’d need only edit 10 each.
This is a collaborative approach if we have 10 editors, for example, each would need only edit less than 30 every week, which is little to ask.The current figure allows us to complete the conversion in just one year.Not all pages are in second-person thus, not every article listed would be affected and would need change.While this figure can be too drastic, consider the following: Thus, I offer this measure to assist the perspective conversion:Įvery week, we create a list of 297 articles-continuing through all until we finish- that we as editors will convert to third-person. While our policy instructs that we have our pages in accordance with third-person, this can be tricky I often find huge pages written entirely in second-person, which is very intimidating as an editor. I propose the following measure to combat the usage of second- (or even first-) person from articles and convert them to third-person.
0 kommentar(er)
